Since the time of the Reformation,
when the light of religious liberty spread throughout much of the world, many old heresies arose that challenged the modern Church. These heresies included Arianism (i.e. the denial of the full deity of Christ, a denial of the deity of the Holy Spirit, and thus,
the denial of the Trinity) and Modalism (i.e. the denial of the distinction between persons of the Godhead; a denial of the Trinity).
In this article, it will be proven that the Scriptures teach that
the Godhead consists of three persons. I will highlight those portions of the Athanasian Creed that are pertinent to the subject
of Modalism (and in particular, Oneness Pentecostal style Modalism):
Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary
that he hold the catholic faith; Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
And
the catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;
Neither confounding the persons, nor dividing
the substance
For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son and another of the Holy Spirit.
But the Godhead of the Father,
of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty co-eternal.
Such as the Father is, such is the Son and
such is the Holy Spirit.
The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate, and the Holy Spirit uncreate.
The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible,
and the Holy Spirit incomprehensible.
The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Spirit eternal.
And yet they are not three eternals,
but one eternal.
As also there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensibles, but one uncreated and one incomprehensible.
So likewise
the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Spirit almighty;
And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty.
So
the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God;
And yet they are not three Gods, but one God.
So likewise the Father
is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Spirit Lord;
And yet they are not three Lords, but one Lord.
For like as we are compelled by the
Christian verity to acknowledge every person by himself to be God and Lord;
so are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say: There
are three Gods or three Lords.
The Father is made of none, neither created nor begotten.
The Son is of the Father alone; not made nor
created, but begotten.
The Holy Spirit is of the Father and of the Son; neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding.
So
there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Spirit, not three Holy Spirits.
And in this Trinity none
is afore, nor after another; none is greater, or less than another.
But the whole three persons are co-eternal, and co-equal.
So that
in all things, as aforesaid, the Unity in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity is to be worshipped.
He therefore that will be saved must
thus think of the Trinity.
Furthermore it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe rightly the incarnation of our
Lord Jesus Christ.
For the right faith is that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and man.
God
of the substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and made of the substance of His mother, born in the world.
Perfect God
and perfect man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting.
Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the
Father as touching His manhood.
Who, although He is God and man, yet He is not two, but one Christ.
One, not by conversion of the Godhead
into flesh, but by taking of the manhood into God.
One altogether, not by the confusion of substance, but by unity of person.
For as
the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ;
Who suffered for our salvation, descended into hell, rose again
the third day from the dead;
He ascended into heaven, He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, God Almighty;
From thence He shall
come to judge the living and the dead.
At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies;
And shall give account of their own
works.
And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting, and they that have done evil into everlasting fire.
This is the
catholic faith, which except a man believe faithfully, he cannot be saved.
-The Athanasian Creed
The Trinitarian believes that there is but one Being Who is the true God: “That we worship one God in Trinity,
and Trinity in Unity.”
God exists in the form of three eternal persons: “For there is one Person of the Father, another of the
Son and another of the Holy Spirit...The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Spirit eternal.”
Yet, these three persons
are not three beings but one Being, not three gods but one God: “And yet they are not three Gods, but one God.”
They are separate
but one at the same time: “…one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity.” Thus, the Persons should not be confused as modes of
God, and neither should the Godhead be divided into three gods: “Neither confounding the persons, nor dividing the substance.”
However, Modalism teaches that God exists not only as one in Being but also as one in Person. Robert Morey describes Modalism:
“Thus,
the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are not to be viewed as three distinct Persons, but as three different manifestations, modes,
administrations, disguises, roles, or offices of one and the same Person…Who is this One Person? The first Modalists believed
that the Father was the Person hiding behind the masks. Thus, if you removed the mask of the Son or the mask of the Holy Spirit,
you would find the “Father only.” It was, thus, the Father who was incarnate in the womb of the Virgin…The Son and the Holy
Spirit are only the Father manifesting Himself in different disguises, ways, or modes.”
-Robert Morey, The Trinity: Evidence and Issues(Iowa Falls, IA: World Bible Publishers, 1996), pp.507-508.
This doctrine was an ancient heresy that has been called many names
throughout the centuries: Sabellianism, Patripassianism, Monarchianism, Modalistic Monarchianism, functionalism, Jesus Only,
Father Only, and Oneness Pentecostalism. The early Christians realized the unbiblical nature of this heresy, and it was universally
condemned. The following are Scripture quotes which prove that God is multi-personal in nature. All quotes are from the
NASB (emphasis mine):
Genesis 19:24
Then the LORD rained on
Commentary:
Here, we have ‘two’ YHWH. One of them was He who appeared in human form and talked to Abraham on earth, and the other was in
heaven. The One on earth called down fire from the One in heaven. There are two YHWH, and yet they are both called YHWH.
Numbers 22:20-22, 35
God came to Balaam at night and said to him,
“If the men have come to call you, rise up and go with them; but only the word which I speak to you shall you do.” So Balaam
arose in the morning, and saddled his donkey and went with the leaders of
Commentary:
God is the
One who stated that Balaam would speak only the words that He told him to. Then, when the angel of the LORD appeared, He told
Balaam that he should only speak the words which the angel of the LORD spoke. Here, the text clearly identifies the “angel of
the LORD” as both the One who is sent by YHWH and YHWH himself! So, we have one YHWH sending another YHWH and they are both
the same Being! [Note: the word ‘angel’ merely means messenger. It is used as a title for humans throughout both
the Old and New Testaments. It does not necessarily denote a created spiritual being of immense power such as Gabriel (Luke
Deuteronomy 6:4
“Hear, O
Commentary:
This is a passage frequently used by Unitarians. However, the Hebrew of this passage actually supports the Trinitarian doctrine! David Cooper notes:
“Prior to the days of Moses Maimonides, the unity of God was expressed by [echad] which, as has been proved
beyond a doubt, has as its primary meaning that of a compound unity. Maimonides, who drafted thirteen articles of faith, in
the second one sets forth the unity of God, using the word [yachid] which in the Tenach is never used to express God’s unity. From these facts it is evident that a new idea was injected into this confession by substituting [yachid] which in every passage carries
the primary idea of oneness in the absolute sense for [echad] which primarily means a compound unity. Hence from the days of
Maimonides on, an interpretation different from the ancient one was placed upon this most important passage.”
-David L. Cooper, as
found in Robert Morey, The Trinity: Evidence and Issues (Iowa Falls, IA: World Bible Publishers, 1996), p.90.
Deuteronomy 6:4
actually supports the doctrine of the Trinity because its word for “one”, ‘echad’, expresses a compound unity and not an absolute
oneness. This passage implies a doctrine of multiple ‘persons’ within the Godhead rather than Unitarianism. [Note: When Trinitarians use the word ‘person’ in reference to the Godhead, it does not mean the same thing as ‘being’. ‘Person’ is
a Greek word that was used in the early centuries of Christianity to describe Trinitarian doctrine.]
Judges 6:11-22
Then the angel of the LORD came and sat under the oak that was in Ophrah, which belonged to Joash the Abiezrite as his
son Gideon was beating out wheat in the wine press in order to save it from the Midianites. The angel of the LORD appeared to
him and said to him, "The LORD is with you, O valiant warrior." Then Gideon said to him, "O my lord, if the LORD is with us,
why then has all this happened to us? And where are all His miracles which our fathers told us about, saying, 'Did not the LORD bring
us up from
Commentary:
This is probably the clearest identification of the “angel of YHWH” with YHWH Himself. In verse 11, it is the “angel of the
LORD” Who is sitting under the oak tree, and then, in verse 14, the One who is sitting under the tree is identified as the LORD himself! Here, the text clearly identifies the “angel of the LORD” as both the One who is sent by YHWH and YHWH himself!
Judges 13:2-23
There
was a certain man of Zorah, of the family of the Danites, whose name was Manoah; and his wife was barren and had borne no children. Then the angel of the LORD appeared to the woman and said to her, "Behold now, you are barren and have borne no children, but you
shall conceive and give birth to a son.”… God listened to the voice of Manoah; and the angel of God came again to the woman as she
was sitting in the field, but Manoah her husband was not with her… Now the angel of the LORD did not appear to Manoah or his wife
again. Then Manoah knew that he was the angel of the LORD. So Manoah said to his wife, "We will surely die, for we have seen
God." But his wife said to him, "If the LORD had desired to kill us, He would not have accepted a burnt offering and a grain
offering from our hands, nor would He have shown us all these things, nor would He have let us hear things like this at this time."
Commentary:
Again, the Scriptures describe the “angel of the LORD” as the LORD Himself! He is both the Messenger of YHWH and YHWH Himself! This is exactly what we would expect if God is Trinitarian in nature.
Isaiah 48:16
"Come near to Me, listen to this: from the
first I have not spoken in secret, from the time it took place, I was there. And now the Lord GOD has sent Me, and His Spirit."
Commentary:
How can the Father (i.e. “the Lord GOD”) send the Holy Spirit if the Holy Spirit is merely one of the manifestations of the Father? It only makes sense if the Father and the Holy Spirit are different ‘Persons’.
Daniel 7:13
"I kept looking in the night visions,
and behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days and was presented before
Him.”
Commentary:
This is the passage where the title,
‘Son of Man’, for the Messiah came from. It was used by Jesus on several occasions (Matthew 26:64 for example). Here,
the Prophet Daniel clearly shows that the ‘Son of Man’ (i.e. God the Son) is a different Hypostasis (i.e. “Person”) than the ‘Ancient
of Days’ (i.e. God the Father).
Modalism
(Part 1)